Poo-Pourri’s New Viral Video Gives You Tips



Poo-Pourri’s New Viral Video Gives You Tips on How to Poop at a Party

First work from its in-house content studio

Number 2 Productions is the brand’s new video-creating division. Poo-Pourri

Poo-Pourri has created an online film division called Number 2 Productions, which will be led by Suzy Batiz, founder, executive producer and CEO. The new division’s main goal is to follow in the footsteps of companies like Red Bull and Dollar Shave Club—companies that have turned their brands into digital-content-creating machines.

Its first DIY effort, dubbed How to Poop at a Party (below), was posted on YouTube on Tuesday, where it’s already garnered 2.4 million views. In the past, the Addison, Texas-based marketer has created a handful of popular videos that have utilized creatives and production houses such as “Uptown Funk” video director Cameron Duddy and Objects of Affection. That will no longer be the case.

“We have a very specific, delicate brand voice that is purposely hard to pull off,” said Nicole Story (pictured below), the lead director for Number 2 Productions. “By bringing production in-house, we have full control.”

There are a pair of forthcoming videos that be released in the next few weeks to complement How to Poop at a Party.

Will Clarke, Poo-Pourri’s vp of marketing, added that his CEO Batiz has had the idea to create an in-house production team “for a while.”


“We had a strategy meeting with [YouTube parent company] Google earlier this year, and after we left that meeting,” he explained, “they affirmed that this is exactly where we needed to take the brand and the company.”

The company makes a deodorizing toilet spray, which it sells online, while competing with names like V.I.Poo. It has hired Hollywood veteran Tess Kelly as a producer to round out a five-person department, which otherwise consists of current Poo-Pourri marketing staffers.

There will be no TV ads as part of the current campaign, per Clark, who described digital as the “cornerstone of our strategy.”

“The internet allows us to ‘go there’ with our content in ways that TV doesn’t,” he said. “It also gives us real-time analytics that allow us to keep our spend efficient and effective.”

Who Profited From the $440 Billion Greek Bailout? Not Greeks

Counter Information


By Jack Rasmus

August 24, 2016 “Information Clearing House” – This week marks the first anniversary of the 2015 Greek debt crisis, the third in that country’s recent history since 2010. Last Aug. 20-21, 2015, the ‘Troika’—i.e., the pan-European institutions of the European Commission (EC), the European Central Bank (ECB), plus the IMF-imposed a third debt deal on Greece. Greece was given US$98 billion in loans from the Troika. A previous 2012 Troika imposed debt deal had added nearly US$200 billion to an initial 2010 debt deal of US$140 billion.

That’s approximately US$440 billion in Troika loans over a five year period, 2010-2015. The question is: who is benefitting from the US$440 billion? It’s not Greece. If not the Greek economy and its people, then who? And have we seen the last of Greek debt crises?

One might think that US$440 billion in loans would have helped Greece…

View original post 1,557 more words


How the Olympics wrecked the Greek economy


Ah, the pageantry of the Olympics: the emotional medal ceremonies, the salacious rumors from inside the Village, the annihilation of entire first-world economies.

All right, generally applied, that last one is a bit of an exaggeration, but it’s true in at least one case. The Olympics are exorbitantly expensive for host countries, requiring extensive construction projects whose costs are rarely recouped, and leaving behind facilities to be overgrown with vines decades later. And in the case of the Athens Summer Games, the pain was particularly sharp. In fact, it helped immerse Greece in the debt crisis that still beleaguers it today.

After decades of traveling the world, the Olympics, like Odysseus, finally returned home in 2004, sending hundreds of thousands of tourists flocking to Athens. But the cost of the Summer Games was calculated at $11 billion, of which the Greeks ended up stuck with $7.8 billion. And that didn’t include billions more for an infrastructure revamp, such as a new airport and metro system.

If you don’t understand how a small Mediterranean economy could handle those kinds of costs, then you’re underestimating the insanity of the European Union. Greece joined the euro currency in 2001. Its debt far exceeded the EU’s acceptable limits, but Goldman Sachs cooked the books so it would qualify, and eurocrats—addled by dreams of “ever-closer union”—looked the other way. This gave it access to the EU’s unsustainably low interest rates and allowed it to go on a spending spree in preparation for the Olympics.

RELATED: Greek socialism and EU imperialism are both to blame for the euro crisis

Only a month after the closing ceremonies, Greece’s newly elected government announced that debt had reached 112 percent of GDP, almost twice the amount permitted by EU rules. According to Greece’s new prime minister, the red ink was concealed by the previous government: “Social policy was done with borrowed cash, military spending did not show up in the budget, debts were created in secret,” he said.

Three months later, Greece conceded it fudged its debt numbers to gain access to the euro, a shocking admission that was promptly shrugged off by EU ministers. So the borrowing continued and the debt festered under the Acropolis. You didn’t need the Oracle of Delphi to predict what would happen next. Today, throttled by the 2008 crash and bled by a series of failed German lab experiments, Greece’s debt-to-GDP ratio stands at 177 percent and its unemployment rate is stuck at more than 23 percent.

The Olympics didn’t destroy Greece, but they were emblematic of the shop-a-thon that ultimately engulfed the European economy. The Games came home and found not suitors, but debtors. Today, Athens is dotted not just with ancient ruins, but modern ones, stagnating pools and abandoned slalom facilities. “It’s hard not to think that maybe it wasn’t worth it,” gymnast Christos Libanovnos told Time magazine.

Greece and the EU are primarily at fault for the spendthrift games, but also deserving of blame is the International Olympic Committee (IOC). Between the Athens Olympics and the crash of 2008, the IOC generated $6 billion in revenue, not a dime of which was used to relieve Greek liabilities. This is common practice: the IOC routinely awards the games to doe-eyed developing nations, many of which simply aren’t able to afford them.

This year is no exception. Beneath the “it’s a small world” sheen of the Rio opening ceremonies was a Brazil in the midst of political crisis and economic recession, with a budget deficit of $6 billion. The Brazilians won’t suffer the same fate as the Greeks, but the tension caused by mounting costs is already palpable: “Brazil cannot pay caviar bills for others,” Rio’s aggravated mayor recently said of the notoriously louche IOC.

RELATED: Privatize the Olympics

What’s the solution? Ventilate the IOC’s corruption, tighten the fiscal requirements for hosting the Olympics, and stay budget-conscious by upping business sponsorships and corporate involvement the way Los Angeles did for the 1984 Summer Games. As my Rare colleague Casey Given noted last week, the Olympics can actually make a profit if they’re willing to privatize.

As for Greece, its economy was leveled in part by those crippling infrastructure investments. And, no, that’s not an oxymoron. Turns out you can’t prime an economy by paying workers to dig holes, no matter what Paul Krugman likes to think.

Module Voice Image

Creator Saito, Miki grateful dead archive


Search Results

63 results

Decorated envelope

Decorated envelope (Envelope)


Decorated envelope

Decorated envelope (Envelope)


Decorated envelope

Decorated envelope (Envelope)


Letter with artwork

Letter with artwork (Fan Art)



US Lost in Afghanistan, but Did Manage to Make Afghanistan the World’s Top Heroin Exporter


Afghanistan has quickly become the world’s leader in smuggling and exporting heroin thanks to U.S. occupation there. Few are aware of the history of the CIA’s running illegal drugs internationally.


I am already receiving the NationofChange newsletter.


The content you are about to read is brought to you by readers like you.

NationofChange works tirelessly to promote progressive change through positive action.

We don’t run ads on our site and we don’t accept corporate funding. We are powered by the people for the people.

If you like what you see, please consider a donation to help us continue operations. We are a 501(c)3 nonprofit and your donation is tax-deductible.Thank you!

I already donated this month.

Afghan Brigadier General Abdul Sama was accused recently of smuggling over 40 pounds of heroin.

It should come as no surprise that an Afghan general was caught smuggling heroin, the surprise is that any high official in that country should be charged with a crime for profiting from the trade in illegal drugs while under the watchful eye of American forces.

Under American occupation, Afghanistan quickly became the world’s leader in opium production, producing over 90% of the world’s supply. The Taliban had almost shut down opium production prior to the US invasion in 2001 to the chagrin of international drug runners, and no doubt the international banking industry, which earns big profits laundering billions of dollars in illegal drug money annually. Illegal drugs account for about 8% of all international trade.

Few Americans are aware of the long history of the CIA’s running illegal drugs internationally, thanks to the untiring efforts of the mainstream press. We’re citizens aware, few would be surprised that heroin production has skyrocketed under US occupation of Afghanistan.

The tragic case of journalist Gary Webb of the San Jose Mercury News is a case in point, and represents perhaps the widest known attempt at suppressing the story of CIA drug-running endeavors, with the mainstream US press shamelessly and dutifully attacking Webb for attempting to expose the inconvenient truth.

That truth: in the 1980’s, the CIA was actively shipping cocaine from Central America into the USA using its own “airline” in order to earn money to circumvent a Congressional ban on continued support for the terrorist Contras, a Reagan-administration-backed counterinsurgency seeking to overthrow democracy in Nicaragua on behalf of US ruling interests. Webb lost his job, and was blackballed from his profession for telling the truth and eventually either was murdered or committed suicide from the pressures our corrupt system can apply against a citizen who blows the whistle.

Former Drug Enforcement Administration (DEA) official Michael Levine wrote that he discovered heroin was being smuggled into the USA inside the bodies of US troops who had died in Vietnam during the sixties. After reporting this ghoulish information, he was transferred and told that it was a CIA operation and he should shut his mouth about it.

After being transferred to South America, Levine then reported on massive cocaine smuggling and was again told to shut his mouth as it too was a CIA operation and he should go along with the program.

Levine eventually realized that much international drug smuggling into the US appears to be under the control of the CIA, and he was wasting his time, so resigned from the DEA.

Levine states without hesitation that “The CIA has long been a major supporter of the people and organizations responsible for supplying drugs to this country. Time and time again, I discovered that various people against whom we were trying to build a case were regarded as assets by the CIA. Of course, at that time those ‘assets’ were described as allies in the Cold War, but my DEA sources tell me that this remains the case even now that the Cold War is over.”

The US government pretends to care about eradicating opium production in Afghanistan, while production soars to record levels. Can this be an accident?

The largest marketplace for illegal drugs continues to be the United States, despite a decades-long so-called “war on drugs.” Can this be an accident?

And can it be an accident that between 2002 and 2013, the 11 years that the US has been occupying and fighting the Taliban in Afghanistan,?

Recall that when the government wanted to stop the recent anti-banker democracy movement known as “Occupy,” it did so in a matter of months, showing clearly where its priorities and capabilities lie. As was exposed in ThisCantBeHappening!, the Obama Administration coordinated efforts nationally with individual cities, where tear gas, beatings, pepper spray, jailing and other tactics were used to deny the right of the people to peaceably assemble. There was even a bizarre plot in Houston to have leaders of the small Occupy movement there murdered using “suppressed rifle fire” –- a plot the FBI knew about, but did nothing to prevent. (Apparently that plan, whose conspirators were never identified publicly, was called off because Occupy famously had no “leaders” who could be targeted.)

That the US government cannot similarly crack down successfully on the annual importation of billions of dollars worth of illegal drugs should cause anyone not comatose to at least question the system.

Our motto should be “Leave no bankster behind.” We know they do buy our politicians, with President Obama having received a record amount of campaign funding in 2008 from the banking industry shortly before he pushed through the massive bailout on their behalf.

As long as international banking makes billions of dollars from the illegal narcotics trade, we can expect the “war on drugs” to be as much of a fraud as the profitable “war on terrorism,” whose contractors also supply those who run our government with massive campaign financing, ensuring we will not soon run out of either drugs or acts of terror (the latter mostly contrived by government agents and paid informants).